Gentlybot is a shared AI development environment for the full product development team. See how product managers, designers, QA, engineering, marketers, sales, CS, support, and operations contribute around the same complex or legacy app without bypassing review.
Scope feasibility, explore UI, coordinate across services, generate test plans, implement changes, and keep every step reviewable.
“Can we prototype scheduled report emails, test the edge cases, and open a reviewable PR?”
Give marketing and sales grounded product answers, live demos, safer claims, and real site changes.
“Can we support this prospect’s SSO workflow, and can we tailor a live demo for them?”
Turn screenshots, tickets, account history, and product behavior into clear replies, QBR briefs, tickets, and fixes.
“Is this export issue a bug, what should I tell the customer, and has the fix shipped?”
Wire Jira, Slack, GitHub, and schedules into repeatable prompts that triage, report, and ship internal fixes.
“When a data-sync bug lands in Jira, reproduce it, find the likely cause, and comment back.”
Each preview shows how that function actually works in Gently: the prompt, grounded answer, plan, real-app sandbox, PR, test output, or review loop. Roles with a “Full page” link open into the complete flow, start to finish.
Feasibility → an approved plan → a working prototype + PR.
View full product managers threadHow does our report export work today, and where would per-team “scheduled email” delivery hook in?
Exports are generated on demand; nothing is scheduled yet. The natural seam:
References
Plan a “scheduled report email” feature: pick a report, a cadence, and recipients.
How does our report export work today, and where would per-team “scheduled email” delivery hook in?
Exports are generated on demand; nothing is scheduled yet. The natural seam:
References
Wireframe to align, live preview to verify, PR to ship the polish.
View full designers threadMatch this redesign for the billing settings card. Wireframe the default and empty states first so we can align.
A wireframe is exactly what was asked for — so Gently renders one you can resize and open full-screen.
Match this redesign for the billing settings card. Wireframe the default and empty states first so we can align.
A wireframe is exactly what was asked for — so Gently renders one you can resize and open full-screen.
Test plans you can run, video proof, and an automated PR test gate.
View full qa & testers threadGenerate a test plan for checkout with coupon codes — happy path plus the edge cases that bite us.
Looks complete. Run it on the live sandbox and capture anything that fails.
Generate a test plan for checkout with coupon codes — happy path plus the edge cases that bite us.
Implement to a verified PR, then auto-fix CI and address review comments.
View full engineering threadWhere is login handled, and why does it skip our rate limiter?
The limiter only wraps the API router; login posts to a separate route that bypasses it:
References
Add a 10/min/IP limiter to login with a 429 path, plus tests. Open a PR.
Where is login handled, and why does it skip our rate limiter?
The limiter only wraps the API router; login posts to a separate route that bypasses it:
References
Real copy + SEO changes on the live site, shipped as a PR.
Rewrite the homepage hero to lead with value — “Ship faster without adding headcount” — and add a meta description to /pricing.
This isn’t a wireframe — Gently edits the real files and shows you the actual change.
Rewrite the homepage hero to lead with value — “Ship faster without adding headcount” — and add a meta description to /pricing.
This isn’t a wireframe — Gently edits the real files and shows you the actual change.
Accurate “can it do X?” answers and tailored live demos.
Acme is asking: do we support SAML SSO and per-seat billing? Anything I should caveat?
Yes to both — here’s what you can say with confidence:
References
Spin up a demo for Acme — their logo, seed it with realistic sample data.
Acme is asking: do we support SAML SSO and per-seat billing? Anything I should caveat?
Yes to both — here’s what you can say with confidence:
References
Jira/cron triggers, auto-triage, and internal scripts as PRs.
View full operations threadA bug lands in Jira → Gently opens a thread automatically and triages it.
Triage for NW-1042 (“Salesforce sync stopped overnight”):
References
A bug lands in Jira → Gently opens a thread automatically and triages it.
Account research, product answers, success plans, and expansion-ready follow-ups.
Prep my QBR for Globex: what changed since renewal, what open issues matter, and where should I steer the conversation?
Here is the customer-ready QBR brief:
References
Turn that into a success plan: talking points, product caveats, follow-up tickets, and one safe feature request.
Prep my QBR for Globex: what changed since renewal, what open issues matter, and where should I steer the conversation?
Here is the customer-ready QBR brief:
References
Code-grounded triage, drafted replies, repro proof, and fix status.
Customer says their CSV export is missing the email column (screenshot). Bug or expected? Draft a reply I can send.
It’s a real bug — the email column was dropped in a recent change. Reply drafted below:
References
Customer says their CSV export is missing the email column (screenshot). Bug or expected? Draft a reply I can send.
It’s a real bug — the email column was dropped in a recent change. Reply drafted below:
References
The safest rollout is narrow: choose one team, one complex app workflow, and one kind of request. Expand once the collaboration and review loop feels good.